THE INFLUENCE OF PROTESTANT POLITICAL THEORY OF THE REFORMATION PERIOD ON THE LIBERAL CONCEPT OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25264/2786-9202/3.2-38-51Keywords:
limited government, personal freedom, tyranny, Reformation, and liberalismAbstract
It is well known that J. Locke is considered the founder of the philosophy of freedom, known as “classical liberalism”, which “describes the growth of personal freedom in contrast to the power of the supreme ruler” (Raath & Freitas, 2002, p. 25). This definition of classical liberalism is offered by the modern conservative philosopher R. Scruton. The social contract, the rule of law, and the system of checks and balances were developed solely to protect personal freedom. In other words, the struggle against tyranny and the introduction of limited government were means of achieving the main goal: personal freedoms. Personal freedom is the central concept of liberalism, for the sake of which, essentially, everything else exists. The foundational root of liberal thought, in the interpretation of most liberal theorists, dates back only to the period of the Enlightenment. Liberalism appears to be a spontaneous phenomenon of a prominent intellectual era that arose without any influence from the previous intellectual tradition. A whole galaxy of outstanding thinkers has made titanic efforts to develop mechanisms of control and restraint of power in order to protect human freedom from oppression. That is, this is a problem of Western political identity in general, and in particular, the identity of liberalism as the first modern ideology. The issue addressed in this article precisely concerns the religious factor that influenced the formation of the liberal concept of limited government. That is, this approach tends to overlook the influence of the Christian religion, which had a total significance in the formation of European culture in the Middle Ages and Modern times, and political theory was no exception. That is, this is a problem of Western political identity in general, and in particular the identity of liberalism as the first modern ideology. The issue of this article addresses precisely the religious factor that influenced the formation of the liberal concept of limited government. After all, the deconstruction of the theory of the divine right of kings during the Reformation can be called a liberal phenomenon, because, as already mentioned at the beginning, liberalism is “about the growth of personal freedom in contrast to the power of the supreme ruler” (Raath & Freitas, 2002, p. 25).
References
Бібліографічні покликання
Acton, J. E. E. D. (1948). Essays on freedom and power (G. Himmelfarb, Ed.). Beacon Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2572124
Acton, J. (2024). Essays on Freedom and Power. Readings from Liberal Writers, 71–72. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003589020-9
Brutus, S. J. (n.d.). Vindiciae, contra tyrannos: Sive, de principis in populum, populique in principem legitima potestate. York University.
Calvin, J. (n.d.). Institutes of the Christian religion (H. Beveridge, Trans.). Christian Classics Ethereal Library. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847710-033
Camion, C. (2009). The right of resistance in Jean Calvin and the Monarchomachs. Ithaque: Revue de philosophie de l’Université de Montréal, 5.
Cantoni, D. (2015). The economic effects of the protestant reformation: testing the weber hypothesis in the German lands. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13: 561-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12117
Giesey, R. E. (1981). Vindiciae contra tyrannos: Traduction française de 1581. Etienne Junius Brutus. The Journal of Modern History, 53(3), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/242347
Goodman, C. (2002). How superior powers ought to be obeyed. Blackmask Online. (Original work published 1558) https://doi.org/10.7312/good91480
Kattsoff, L. O. (1949). Essays on Freedom and Power. By Lord Acton. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1948. 452 pp. Social Forces, 28(1), 102–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2572124
Knox, J. (2020). The first blast of the trumpet against the monstrous regiment of women. Ex-classics Project. (Original work published 1558)
Ponet, J. (2018). A short treatise on political power: Abridged and annotated (A. Comegna, Ed.). Libertarianism.org; Cato Institute.
Raath, A. W. G., & de Freitas, S. A. (2002). Calling and resistance: Huldrych Zwingli’s (1484–1531) political theology and his legacy of resistance to tyranny. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship / Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 67(1), 45–76. DOI: 10.4102/koers.v67i1.362
Wagner, J. A., & Schmid, S. W. (2011). Encyclopedia of Tudor England (3 vols.). ABC-CLIO. DOI: 10.5040/9798216027850
Августин Блаженный. (1998). Творения (том третий). О граде Божием. Киев: УЦИММ-Пресс. 508 с.
Актон, Дж. Е. Е. Д. (2019). Нариси з історії свободи, влади та демократії (П. Таращук, Н. Поліщук, Н. Обвінцева, & О. Проценко, пер. з англ.). Простір. 712 с.
Макґрат, А. (2018). Небезпечна ідея християнства. Протестантська революція. Історія від XVI до XXI століття (О. Панич, пер. з англ.). Дух і Літера. 664 с.
Скрутон, Р. (2022). Консерватизм. Запрошення до великої традиції (К. Диса, пер. з англ.). Наш Формат. 176 с.
References
Acton, J. E. E. D. (1948). Essays on freedom and power (G. Himmelfarb, Ed.). Beacon Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2572124
Acton, J. E. E. D. (2019). Narysy z istorii svobody, vlady ta demokratii [Essays on the History of Freedom, Power, and Democracy] (O. Protsenko, Ed.; P. Tarashchuk, N. Polishchuk, & N. Obvintseva, Trans.). Vydavnychyi dim Prostir. [in Ukrainian].
Acton, J. (2024). Essays on Freedom and Power. Readings from Liberal Writers, 71–72. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003589020-9.
Avgustin Blazhennyi. (1998). Tvoreniia [Creations] (Vol. 3, O grade Bozhiem). Aleteiia; UCIMM-Press. [in Russian].
Brutus, S. J. (n.d.). Vindiciae, contra tyrannos: Sive, de principis in populum, populique in principem legitima potestate. York University.
Calvin, J. (n.d.). Institutes of the Christian religion (H. Beveridge, Trans.). Christian Classics Ethereal Library. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847710-033
Camion, C. (2009). The right of resistance in Jean Calvin and the Monarchomachs. Ithaque: Revue de philosophie de l’Université de Montréal, 5.
Cantoni, D. (2015). The economic effects of the protestant reformation: testing the weber hypothesis in the German lands. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13: 561-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12117
Giesey, R. E. (1981). Vindiciae contra tyrannos: Traduction française de 1581. Etienne Junius Brutus. The Journal of Modern History, 53(3), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/242347
Goodman, C. (2002). How superior powers ought to be obeyed. Blackmask Online. (Original work published 1558) https://doi.org/10.7312/good91480.
Kattsoff, L. O. (1949). Essays on Freedom and Power. By Lord Acton. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1948. 452 pp. Social Forces, 28(1), 102–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2572124.
Knox, J. (2020). The first blast of the trumpet against the monstrous regiment of women. Ex-classics Project. (Original work published 1558)
McGrath, A. E. (2017). Nebezpechna ideia khrystyianstva. Protestantska revoliutsiia: Istoriia vid XVI do XXI stolittia [The Dangerous Idea of Christianity: The Protestant Revolution. A History from the 16th to the 21st Century] (O. Panych, Trans.). Dukh i Litera. [in Ukrainian].
Ponet, J. (2018). A short treatise on political power: Abridged and annotated (A. Comegna, Ed.). Libertarianism.org; Cato Institute.
Raath, A. W. G., & de Freitas, S. A. (2002). Calling and resistance: Huldrych Zwingli’s (1484–1531) political theology and his legacy of resistance to tyranny. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship / Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 67(1), 45–76. DOI: 10.4102/koers.v67i1.362
Scruton, R. (2022). Konservatyzm. Zaproshennia do velykoi tradytsii [Conservatism: An Invitation to a Great Tradition] (K. Dysa, Trans.). Nash Format. [in Ukrainian].
Wagner, J. A., & Schmid, S. W. (2011). Encyclopedia of Tudor England (3 vols.). ABC-CLIO. DOI: 10.5040/9798216027850
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Микола Харламенков

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







